Scrupuli

blunt essays with sharp points

Andrea Dworkin

by Scrvpvlvs
Mar 30, 2002 2:21 PM–I saw Andrea Dworkin speak today—a CSPAN2 broadcast of a recent talk and Q&A session. During the Q&A, she made several statements that together I considered very interesting and provocative. Though she believes the legal system is imperfect and needs reform to better prosecute crimes against women, she is still in favor of using the existing legal system to the extent that it works. But she thinks individual violence is an even better way to punish men. She said she had a very deep esteem for violence. She meant, in part, being empowered to fight back when physically attacked. But she also meant extrajudicial retaliation: she gave an example of a mother of an abused child who, feeling the pedophile had not been adequately punished, shot and killed the perpetrator. She admired what this woman did.

I’ve heard Andrea Dworkin’s name thrown around for years but have not read her books or heard her speak before. And I have a new respect for her as a true radical.

I have begun to believe that Dworkin is a creative force and a point of view which may appeal to many people and make the struggle against domination of women more difficult, painful, and divisive.

Retaliatory violence will only escalate and perpetuate violence. I look at the violent conflicts between ethnic groups throughout the world which exist, not because of the original disagreement, but because of the long history of retaliation and counter-retaliation which creates a perpetual state of war between them.

My impression from Dworkin’s talk is that she is able to see and clearly articulate the problems women face—to look at American culture from the outside and criticize it, and to deplore maltreatment of women that Americans overlook or marginalize. This, and her rhetoric of counterviolence, are emotionally compelling, and continue to influence generations of women in a way which I think is ultimately tragic. This is why I now think she is worth paying attention to. Too many men hurt and kill women. Too many women are going to think the solution is to do the same to men.

What America needs is to grow up emotionally. The immaturity which is evident in this culture, passed on to children from their childish parents, embraces prejudice (ethnic hatred), and violence as a solution. Whereas what we need is to mature to the point where we can respect people who are different, and embrace tolerance, humility, and love as a solution.

Besides comments on the opinions I’ve just expressed, I’m also interested in any suggestions, from people who have read Dworkin, on the best book to buy to further explore and more deeply understand her position on the value of extrajudicial violence. (go to complete article)

Share:

0 comments

about.me

Follow

feed

E-mail: enter address

Project Euler competitor metaed

vs.

Project Euler competitor db8

profile for MetaEd on Stack Exchange, a network of free, community-driven Q&A sites

Recent Articles

Open letter re: Grinnell College alumni “lifetime”...

Spybot – Search & Destroy interferes with Lync 201...

A moment of silence

Rondeau

Howard Schultz of Starbucks: firm on support for m...

In each of us, two natures are at war

Clorox does not understand how to measure bleach

This season’s pie recipe

Adamah

Parting

Archives

November 1999
June 2000
July 2000
September 2001
October 2001
February 2002
March 2002
June 2003
February 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
February 2005
March 2005
November 2005
July 2007
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
April 2009
September 2009
December 2009
February 2010
March 2010
May 2010
June 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
April 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
September 2011
December 2011
February 2012
April 2012
May 2012
June 2012
July 2012
August 2012
September 2012
November 2012
January 2013
February 2013
April 2013
February 2014
May 2014
October 2014
June 2017